A prospective, blinded evaluation of a video-assisted '4-stage approach' during undergraduate student practical skills training

2014 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​A prospective, blinded evaluation of a video-assisted '4-stage approach' during undergraduate student practical skills training​
Schwerdtfeger, K.; Wand, S.; Schmid, O.; Roessler, M.; Quintel, M.; Leissner, K. B. & Russo, S. G.​ (2014) 
BMC Medical Education14 art. 104​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-104 

Documents & Media

1472-6920-14-104.pdf382.76 kBAdobe PDF

License

Published Version

Attribution 2.0 CC BY 2.0

Details

Authors
Schwerdtfeger, Katrin; Wand, Saskia; Schmid, Oliver; Roessler, Markus; Quintel, Michael; Leissner, Kay B.; Russo, Sebastian Giuseppe
Abstract
Background: The 4-stage approach (4-SA) is used as a didactic method for teaching practical skills in international courses on resuscitation and the structured care of trauma patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate objective and subjective learning success of a video-assisted 4-SA in teaching undergraduate medical students. Methods: The participants were medical students learning the principles of the acute treatment of trauma patients in their multidiscipline course on emergency and intensive care medicine. The participants were quasi-randomly divided into two groups. The 4-SA was used in both groups. In the control group, all four steps were presented by an instructor. In the study group, the first two steps were presented as a video. At the end of the course a 5-minute objective, structured clinical examination (OSCE) of a simulated trauma patient was conducted. The test results were divided into objective results obtained through a checklist with 9 dichotomous items and the assessment of the global performance rated subjectively by the examiner on a Likert scale from 1 to 6. Results: 313 students were recruited; the results of 256 were suitable for analysis. The OSCE results were excellent in both groups and did not differ significantly (control group: median 9, interquantil range (IQR) 8-9, study group: median 9, IQR 8-9; p = 0.29). The global performance was rated significantly better for the study group (median 1, IQR 1-2 vs. median 2, IQR 1-3; p < 0.01). The relative knowledge increase, stated by the students in their evaluation after the course, was greater in the study group (85% vs. 80%). Conclusion: It is possible to employ video assistance in the classical 4-SA with comparable objective test results in an OSCE. The global performance was significantly improved with use of video assistance.
Issue Date
2014
Status
published
Publisher
Biomed Central Ltd
Journal
BMC Medical Education 
ISSN
1472-6920

Reference

Citations


Social Media