Separating Fusion from Rivalry

2014 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Separating Fusion from Rivalry​
Kallenberger, S. M.; Schmidt, C.; Dechent, P.; Forster, C.; von Steinbuechel, N.; Wuestenberg, T. & Strasburger, H.​ (2014) 
PLoS ONE9(7) art. e103037​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103037 

Documents & Media

journal.pone.0103037.pdf2.76 MBAdobe PDF

License

Published Version

Attribution 4.0 CC BY 4.0

Details

Authors
Kallenberger, Stefan M.; Schmidt, Constanze; Dechent, Peter; Forster, Clemens; von Steinbuechel, Nicole; Wuestenberg, Torsten; Strasburger, Hans
Abstract
Visual fusion is the process in which differing but compatible binocular information is transformed into a unified percept. Even though this is at the basis of binocular vision, the underlying neural processes are, as yet, poorly understood. In our study we therefore aimed to investigate neural correlates of visual fusion. To this end, we presented binocularly compatible, fusible (BF), and incompatible, rivaling (BR) stimuli, as well as an intermediate stimulus type containing both binocularly fusible and monocular, incompatible elements (BFR). Comparing BFR stimuli with BF and BR stimuli, respectively, we were able to disentangle brain responses associated with either visual fusion or rivalry. By means of functional magnetic resonance imaging, we measured brain responses to these stimulus classes in the visual cortex, and investigated them in detail at various retinal eccentricities. Compared with BF stimuli, the response to BFR stimuli was elevated in visual cortical areas V1 and V2, but not in V3 and V4 - implying that the response to monocular stimulus features decreased from V1 to V4. Compared to BR stimuli, the response to BFR stimuli decreased with increasing eccentricity, specifically within V3 and V4. Taken together, it seems that although the processing of exclusively monocular information decreases from V1 to V4, the processing of binocularly fused information increases from earlier to later visual areas. Our findings suggest the presence of an inhibitory neural mechanism which, depending on the presence of fusion, acts differently on the processing of monocular information.
Issue Date
2014
Status
published
Publisher
Public Library Science
Journal
PLoS ONE 
ISSN
1932-6203
Sponsor
Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2014

Reference

Citations


Social Media