Evaluation of removal forces of implantsupported zirconia copings depending on abutment geometry, luting agent and cleaning method during re-cementation

2014 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Evaluation of removal forces of implantsupported zirconia copings depending on abutment geometry, luting agent and cleaning method during re-cementation​
Roediger, M.; Rinke, S.; Ehret-Kleinau, F.; Pohlmeyer, F.; Lange, K.; Buergers, R. & Gersdorff, N.​ (2014) 
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics6(3) pp. 233​-240​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.3.233 

Documents & Media

jap-6-233.pdf1.16 MBAdobe PDF

License

Published Version

Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 CC BY-NC 3.0

Details

Authors
Roediger, Matthias; Rinke, Sven; Ehret-Kleinau, Fenja; Pohlmeyer, Franziska; Lange, Katharina; Buergers, Ralf; Gersdorff, Nikolaus
Abstract
PURPOSE. To evaluate the effects of different abutment geometries in combination with varying luting agents and the effectiveness of different cleaning methods (prior to re-cementation) regarding the retentiveness of zirconia copings on implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Implants were embedded in resin blocks. Three groups of titanium abutments (pre-fabricated, height: 7.5 mm, taper: 5.7; customized-long, height: 6.79 mm, taper: 4.8; customized-short, height: 4.31 mm, taper: 4.8) were used for luting of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia copings with a semi-permanent (Telio CS) and a provisional cement (Temp Bond NE). Retention forces were evaluated using a universal testing machine. Furthermore, the influence of cleaning methods (manually, manually in combination with ultrasonic bath or sandblasting) prior to re-cementation with a provisional cement (Temp Bond NE) was investigated with the pre-fabricated titanium abutments (height: 7.5 mm, taper: 5.7) and SEM-analysis of inner surfaces of the copings was performed. Significant differences were determined via twoway ANOVA. RESULTS. Significant interactions between abutment geometry and luting agent were observed. Temp Bond NE showed the highest level of retentiveness on customized-long abutments, but was negatively affected by other abutment geometries. In contrast, luting with Telio CS demonstrated consistent results irrespective of the varying abutment geometries. Manual cleaning in combination with an ultrasonic bath was the only cleaning method tested prior to re-cementation that revealed retentiveness levels not inferior to primary cementation. CONCLUSION. No superiority for one of the two cements could be demonstrated because their influences on retentive strength are also depending on abutment geometry. Only manual cleaning in combination with an ultrasonic bath offers retentiveness levels after re-cementation comparable to those of primary luting.
Issue Date
2014
Status
published
Publisher
Korean Acad Prosthodontics
Journal
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 
ISSN
2005-7814; 2005-7806

Reference

Citations


Social Media