The use of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal to avoid intubation in patients failing non-invasive ventilation – a cost analysis

2015 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​The use of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal to avoid intubation in patients failing non-invasive ventilation – a cost analysis​
Braune, S.; Burchardi, H.; Engel, M.; Nierhaus, A.; Ebelt, H.; Metschke, M. & Rosseau, S. et al.​ (2015) 
BMC Anesthesiology15(1) art. 160​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0139-0 

Documents & Media

12871_2015_Article_139.pdf576.13 kBAdobe PDF

License

Published Version

Attribution 4.0 CC BY 4.0

Details

Authors
Braune, Stephan; Burchardi, Hilmar; Engel, Markus; Nierhaus, Axel; Ebelt, Henning; Metschke, Maria; Rosseau, Simone; Kluge, Stefan
Abstract
Abstract Background To evaluate the economic implications of the pre-emptive use of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) to avoid invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in patients with hypercapnic ventilatory insufficiency failing non-invasive ventilation (NIV). Methods Retrospective ancillary cost analysis of data extracted from a recently published multicentre case–control-study (n = 42) on the use of arterio-venous ECCO2R to avoid IMV in patients with acute on chronic ventilatory failure. Cost calculations were based on average daily treatment costs for intensive care unit (ICU) and normal medical wards as well as on the specific costs of the ECCO2R system. Results In the group treated with ECCO2R IMV was avoided in 90 % of cases and mean hospital length of stay (LOS) was shorter than in the matched control group treated with IMV (23.0 vs. 42.0 days). The overall average hospital treatment costs did not differ between the two groups (41.134 vs. 39.366 €, p = 0.8). A subgroup analysis of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) revealed significantly lower median ICU length of stay (11.0 vs. 35.0 days), hospital length of stay (17.5 vs. 51.5 days) and treatment costs for the ECCO2R group (19.610 vs. 46.552 €, p = 0.01). Conclusions Additional costs for the use of arterio-venous ECCO2R to avoid IMV in patients with acute-on-chronic ventilatory insufficiency failing NIV may be offset by a cost reducing effect of a shorter length of ICU and hospital stay.
Issue Date
2015
Journal
BMC Anesthesiology 
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media