Explaining temporal trends in annualised relapse rates in placebo groups of randomised controlled trials in relapsing multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-regression

2013 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Explaining temporal trends in annualised relapse rates in placebo groups of randomised controlled trials in relapsing multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-regression​
Steinvorth, S. M.; Roever, C. ; Schneider, S.; Nicholas, R.; Straube, S. & Friede, T.​ (2013) 
Multiple Sclerosis Journal19(12) pp. 1580​-1586​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458513481009 

License

Published Version

Special user license Goescholar License

Details

Authors
Steinvorth, Simon M.; Roever, Christian ; Schneider, Simon; Nicholas, Richard; Straube, Sebastian; Friede, Tim
Abstract
Background: Recent studies have shown a decrease in annualised relapse rates (ARRs) in placebo groups of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search of RCTs in RMS. Data on eligibility criteria and baseline characteristics were extracted and tested for significant trends over time. A meta-regression was conducted to estimate their contribution to the decrease of trial ARRs over time. Results: We identified 56 studies. Patient age at baseline (p < 0.001), mean duration of multiple sclerosis (MS) at baseline (p = 0.048), size of treatment groups (p = 0.003), Oxford Quality Scale scores (p = 0.021), and the number of eligibility criteria (p<0.001) increased significantly, whereas pre-trial ARR (p = 0.001), the time span over which pre-trial ARR was calculated (p < 0.001), and the duration of placebo-controlled follow-up (p = 0.006) decreased significantly over time. In meta-regression of trial placebo ARR, the temporal trend was found to be insignificant, with major factors explaining the variation: pre-trial ARR, the number of years used to calculate pre-trial ARR and study duration. Conclusion: The observed decline in trial ARRs may result from decreasing pre-trial ARRs and a shorter time period over which pre-trial ARRs were calculated. Increasing patient age and duration of illness may also contribute.
Issue Date
2013
Status
published
Publisher
Sage Publications Ltd
Journal
Multiple Sclerosis Journal 
ISSN
1477-0970; 1352-4585
Sponsor
National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre

Reference

Citations


Social Media