Library Publishing and the University Press in the United States and Germany: Lessons from Two Academic Contexts for Sustaining the Scholarly Book: Lessons from Two Academic Contexts for Sustaining the Scholarly Book

2017 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Library Publishing and the University Press in the United States and Germany: Lessons from Two Academic Contexts for Sustaining the Scholarly Book: ​Lessons from Two Academic Contexts for Sustaining the Scholarly Book​
Bargheer, M.   & Walker, K.​ (2017) 
Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis3(41) pp. 291​-307​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.18452/18480 

Documents & Media

bfp-2017-0037-orig.pdf6.82 MBUnknownbfp-2017-0037.pdf6.82 MBUnknownbfp-2017-0037.png46.62 kBUnknownbfp-2017-0037.txt80.92 kBUnknown

License

Details

Authors
Bargheer, Margo ; Walker, Kizer
Abstract
Many academic libraries have embraced an active publishing role in recent years, an important component in libraries’ efforts to address mounting pressures throughout the scholarly communications cycle. Libraries in the United States and Germany have been especially assertive in this arena. This article focuses on one particular aspect of libraries’ publishing efforts in Germany and the U. S.: interventions to make the production and dissemination of the scholarly book (in print and electronic formats) more economically sustainable and its content more open. This article discusses the role of the scholarly book for early-career researchers in the humanities and social sciences and reflects on intercontinental differences. The article considers the library efforts in the context of broader, university-based publishing activities in both national contexts, particularly the relationship of library publishing and university presses. The authors dis- cuss how differences and commonalities between the academic and economic contexts in the U. S. and Germany have led to institutional responses that diverge and converge in significant ways and they suggest that such a comparison can usefully inform scholarly communications strategies in both countries. The article considers broad national trends and also draws on examples from the authors’ home institutions: the State and University Library at Göttingen and Cornell University Library in Ithaca, New York.
Issue Date
2017
Publisher
De Gruyter
Journal
Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis 
ISSN
0341-4183
eISSN
1865-7648
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media